🐏
Update:

This page is under review after the issuance of the "Dear Colleague" letter from the U.S. Department of Education and the Notice of Civil Rights Term and Condition of Award from the National Institutes of Health.

College of Humanities and Sciences

Faculty and Staff Resources

Scholarly Leave Review Rubric

Dean's Office Checklist

Applicant Name First and last name
Eligible for leave in selected academic year: Yes / No
Previous leave received:  Year / None
Type of previous leave: Study-Research / Educational / N/A
Submission of 150-word abstract: Yes / No
Submission of CV: Yes / No
Submission of one-page narrative with specific goals and timeline: Yes / No
Submission of letter from chair/director: Yes / No
Ranking by chair/director (if applicable): 1 (highest), 2, 3, etc.

Reviewer Ratings

The three categories below are rated according to the following scale:

  • 5: Exceptional
  • 4: Above average
  • 3: Average
  • 2: Below average
  • 1: Unsatisfactory

Significance of the work proposed: The extent to which the proposal will contribute to the applicant's specific field of research or education.

Relationship to productivity: The extent to which the proposed activity will contribute to the applicant’s scholarly and/or educational productivity.

Connection with the mission: The extent to which the proposed activity aligns with the mission of the department/school and College.

Reviewers are asked to add comments to each of their ratings.

Ranking

Reviewers rank the proposal compared to proposals in the same department/school (1=highest, 2, 3, etc.) and are asked to add comments about their rankings.