Scholarly Leave Review Rubric

Dean's Office Checklist

Applicant Name	First and last name
Eligible for leave in selected academic year:	Yes / No
Previous leave received:	Year / None
Type of previous leave:	Study-Research / Educational / N/A
Submission of 150-word abstract:	Yes / No
Submission of CV:	Yes / No
Submission of one-page narrative with specific goals and timeline:	Yes / No
Submission of letter from chair/director:	Yes / No
Ranking by chair/director (if applicable):	1 (highest), 2, 3, etc.

Reviewer Ratings

The three categories below are rated according to the following scale:

• 5: Exceptional
• 4: Above average
• 3: Average
• 2: Below average
• 1: Unsatisfactory

Significance of the work proposed: The extent to which the proposal will contribute to the applicant's specific field of research or education.

Relationship to productivity: The extent to which the proposed activity will contribute to the applicant’s scholarly and/or educational productivity.

Connection with the mission: The extent to which the proposed activity aligns with the mission of the department/school and College.

Reviewers are asked to add comments to each of their ratings.

Ranking

Reviewers rank the proposal compared to proposals in the same department/school (1=highest, 2, 3, etc.) and are asked to add comments about their rankings.