Scholarly Leave Review Rubric
Dean's Office Checklist
|Applicant Name||First and last name|
|Eligible for leave in selected academic year:||Yes / No|
|Previous leave received:||Year / None|
|Type of previous leave:||Study-Research / Educational / N/A|
|Submission of 150-word abstract:||Yes / No|
|Submission of CV:||Yes / No|
|Submission of one-page narrative with specific goals and timeline:||Yes / No|
|Submission of letter from chair/director:||Yes / No|
|Ranking by chair/director (if applicable):||1 (highest), 2, 3, etc.|
The three categories below are rated according to the following scale:
- 5: Exceptional
- 4: Above average
- 3: Average
- 2: Below average
- 1: Unsatisfactory
Significance of the work proposed: The extent to which the proposal will contribute to the applicant's specific field of research or education.
Relationship to productivity: The extent to which the proposed activity will contribute to the applicant’s scholarly and/or educational productivity.
Connection with the mission: The extent to which the proposed activity aligns with the mission of the department/school and College.
Reviewers are asked to add comments to each of their ratings.
Reviewers rank the proposal compared to proposals in the same department/school (1=highest, 2, 3, etc.) and are asked to add comments about their rankings.